COMMONWEALTH'S MOTION TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL AGAINST OR DIRECTED TO DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, RESPONDENT et al v. HARRIS

Filing 43

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO REMAND IS DENIED. THE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/22/2013. 8/23/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED(kk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA __________________________________________ IN RE: COMMONWEALTH’S MOTION : TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL : AGAINST OR DIRECTED TO DEFENDER : ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : v. : : FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS. : MISCELLANEOUS ACTION NO. 13-62 ORDER AND NOW, this 22nd day of August 2013, upon consideration of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s Motion to Remand (Doc. No. 6), and the Federal Community Defender Organization’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 5), and the responses and replies in support of and in opposition thereto, after oral argument on the Motions, and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this day, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Motion to Remand is DENIED. 2. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe ______________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?