COMMONWEALTH'S MOTION TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL AGAINST OR DIRECTED TO DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA, RESPONDENT et al v. HARRIS

Filing 48

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO.44) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/2/2013. 10/3/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (kk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: COMMONWEALTH'S MOTION TO APPOINT NEW COUNSEL AGAINST OR DIRECTED TO DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA MISCELLANEOUS ACTION NO.l3-62 v. FRANCIS BAUER HARRIS ORDER AND NOW, this 2nd day of October 2013, upon consideration ofthe Commonwealth's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. No. 44) and the response thereto (Doc. No. 46), it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion the Motion is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED BY THE COURT: C~.R~ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?