BOYD v. WETZEL et al

Filing 26

ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR ON 12/11/17. 12/12/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COURTNEY BOYD v. JOHN E. WETZEL, et al. : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-0098 ORDER AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, together with the response thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa, and in the absence of any objections,1 I HEREBY ORDER that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3. There is no probable cause for a certificate of appealability. 4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s J. William Ditter, Jr. J. WILLIAM DITTER, JR. J. 1 On December 9, 2016, Petitioner’s sentence of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole was vacated pursuant to Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) and Petitioner was re-sentenced to a term of 30 years to life in prison. Petitioner was subsequently granted parole and released from prison. While Petitioner’s Miller claim in the instant petition was rendered moot by his re-sentencing, Petitioner presented other claims in his habeas petition which were reviewed by Judge Caracappa in her Report and Recommendation. Unfortunately, the Clerk’s Office has been unable to send Petitioner a copy of the Report and Recommendation as Petitioner failed to update his address upon release from prison. Recognizing Petitioner’s unique circumstances, my chambers made diligent efforts to ascertain his current address to no avail.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?