RODRIGUEZ v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al

Filing 7

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FEDERAL CLAIMS IS GRANTED. THE COURT DECLINES TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS STATE LAW CLAIMS, AND THEREFORE PLAINTIFFS STATE LAW CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE;ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 3/6/14. 3/6/14 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ZEYNA RODRIGUEZ, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF JOHN DOE, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 14-187 ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of March, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Federal Claims, and Plaintiffs’ response thereto, and for the reasons provided in this Court’s Memorandum dated March 6, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The motion (Document No. 2) is GRANTED. 2. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ state law claims, and therefore Plaintiffs’ state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. BY THE COURT: Berle M. Schiller, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?