TOMLIN et al v. PEASE et al

Filing 129

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS KING AND ADIS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCUMENT NO. 87 ) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS ON ALL CLAIMS AGAINST KING AND ADI. DEFENDANTS GLENNON AND BRAVOS MOTION FOR SUMM ARY JUDGMENT (DOCUMENT NO. 94 ) IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS ON ALL CLAIMS AGAINST GLENNON AND BRAVO. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOCUMENT NO. 90 ) IS DENIED. THE CASE SHALL PROCEE D AS A BENCH TRIAL BEGINNING DECEMBER 7, 2015, AND PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANT THE UNITED STATES SHALL ADHERE TO ALL PREVIOUS DEADLINES AND INSTRUCTIONS RELATING TO TRIAL. ALL CROSS CLAIMS FILED IN THIS CASE ARE DENIED. ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 11/30/15. 12/1/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KARL A. TOMLIN and ROCHELLE
TOMLIN as Executors of the Estate of
CONSTANCE M. TOMLIN, deceased,
Plaintiffs,

:
:
:
:
:
v.
:
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., :
Defendants.
:

CIVIL ACTION

No. 14-202

ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion for
Summary Judgment of Defendants James C. King, III, M.D. and Advanced Diagnostic Imaging,
P.C., the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Susan M. Glennon, M.D. and Bravo Health
Advanced Care Center, P.C., and the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs, and all responses
thereon, and for the reasons contained in this Court’s Memorandum of November 30, 2015, it is
hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Defendants King and ADI’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 83)
is GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and against
Plaintiffs on all claims against King and ADI.

2.

Defendants Glennon and Bravo’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No.
94) is GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants and against
Plaintiffs on all claims against Glennon and Bravo.

3.

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 90) is DENIED. The
case shall proceed as a bench trial beginning December 7, 2015, and Plaintiffs and
Defendant the United States shall adhere to all previous deadlines and instructions

relating to trial.
4.

All cross claims filed in this case are DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

Berle M. Schiller, J.

2