CURTIS v. WETZEL et al
ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION IS GRANTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. PURSUANT TO RULE 58 OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENETED ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 3/29/17. 3/29/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(ti, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN WETZEL, et al.,
AND NOW, this
day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the
defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Document #100), the plaintiff’s cross-motion
for summary judgment (Document #106), and the exhibits and responses thereto, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
The defendants’ motion is GRANTED in its entirety.
The plaintiff’s cross-motion is DENIED in its entirety.
Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment is
hereby ENTERED on behalf of the defendants and against the plaintiff.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED for all purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?