FREEMAN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
Filing
18
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED; PETITIONER'S REQUESTS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOC NOS. 3 AND 4) ARE DENIED; PETITIONER'S MOTIONS AT DOC. NOS. 11, 12, 13, 14 AND 16 ARE DENIED AS MOOT; AND A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS NOT GRANTED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 9/3/14. 9/3/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
\'"."1·, .
we,~ U2 2014
CIVIL ACTION -
BARRY FREEMAN
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA , et al.
NO. 14-0805
ORDER
AND NOW, this
~Nl_day of~, 2014, upon careful and
independent consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and
Recommendation of Thomas J. Rueter, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby
ORDERED
1.
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED;
3.
Petitioner's requests for appointment of counsel (Doc. Nos. 3 and 4) are
DENIED;
4.
Petitioner's motions at Document Nos. 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16 are DENIED
AS MOOT; and
5.
A certificate of appealability is not granted.
BY THE COURT:
ENTERED
SEP 0 3 2014
~·
HARVEY BART~E, III,
J.
CLERK OF COURT
--------··
----
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?