DEVINE v. MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP et al

Filing 59

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED IN PART. DR. MCCAULEY QUALIFIES AS AN EXPERT AND HIS OPINION IS RELEVANT TO THE FOURTH AMENDMENT USE OF FORCE CLAIM. (COMPL., ECF NO. 1 , COUNT I) HE MAY TESTIFY WITH RESPECT TO PREVAILING USE OF FORCE STANDAR DS IN THE FIELD OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND WHETHER THE DEFENDANTS USE OF FORCE WAS IN ACCORD WITH THE STANDARDIZED POLICE PROCEDURES GIVEN THE FACTS OF THIS CASE. DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART. DR. MCCAULEY IS PRECLUDED FROM OPINING THAT THE DEFENDANTS USE OF FORCE WAS UNREASONABLE OR EXCESSIVE. HE MAY NOT OPINE ON ANY ULTIMATE LEGAL QUESTION FOR THE FACT-FINDER. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE LYNNE A. SITARSKI ON 4/29/16. 4/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DIANE DEVINE, Plaintiff, v. MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No.: 14-1072 ORDER AND NOW, this 29th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Preclude the Opinions and Testimony of Plaintiff’s Expert R. Paul McCauley (ECF No. 43) and the parties’ responses thereto, (Pl’s Resp., ECF No. 47; Defs.’ Reply, ECF No. 48; Pl’s SurReply, ECF No. 54), and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum filed concurrently with this Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1) Defendants’ Motion is DENIED IN PART. Dr. McCauley qualifies as an expert and his opinion is relevant to the Fourth Amendment use of force claim. (Compl., ECF No.1, Count I) He may testify with respect to prevailing use of force standards in the field of law enforcement and whether the Defendants’ use of force was in accord with the standardized police procedures given the facts of this case. 2) Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART. Dr. McCauley is precluded from opining that the Defendants’ use of force was unreasonable or excessive. He may not opine on any ultimate legal question for the fact-finder. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lynne A. Sitarski LYNNE A. SITARSKI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?