FATTAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al

Filing 70

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 46) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: TO THE EXTENT THE MOTION SEEKS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE U.S. ON CLAIMS FOR A TAX REFUND, IT IS GRANTED; TO THE EXTENT THE MOTION SEEKS A JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE U.S. ON THE WRONGFUL DISCLOSURE CLAIM, IT IS DENIED; AND JUDGMENT WILL BE ENTERED UPON CONCLUSION OF THE TRIAL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 5/17/17. 5/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHAKA FATTAH, JR. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1092 ORDER NOW, this 17th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 46), the plaintiff’s response, the defendants’ reply, and a review of the record, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. To the extent the motion seeks judgment in favor of the United States on claims for a tax refund, it is GRANTED; 2. To the extent the motion seeks a judgment in favor of the United States on the wrongful disclosure claim, it is DENIED; and 3. Judgment will be entered upon conclusion of the trial. /s/ Timothy J. Savage______________ TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?