HENRY v. THOMAS et al
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFTS., ARTHUR JOHNSON AND LIEUTENANT L. WILLIAMS AND AGAINST PLFF. SIDDEEQ BASIL HENRY ON ALL CLAIMS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL CLAIMS AGAINST DEFT. WILLIAM FOWLER ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/9/17. 5/9/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
SIDDEEQ BASIL HENRY
JOHN THOMAS, et al.
AND NOW this 9th day of May, 2017, upon consideration of the motion for summary
judgment by defendants Arthur Johnson and Lieutenant L. Williams, Dkt. No. 52, and plaintiff
Siddeeq Basil Henry’s response, Dkt. No. 58, it is ORDERED that defendants’ motion is
GRANTED. JUDGMENT is ENTERED in favor of defendants, Arthur Johnson and Lieutenant
L. Williams and against plaintiff Siddeeq Basil Henry on all claims.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that all claims against defendant William Fowler are
dismissed without prejudice for lack of service within ninety days pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?