BURTON v. NUTTER et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' "MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM" (DOC. NO. 7 ) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF IS GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AND SERVE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT STATING A PLAUSIBLE CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANTS UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 CONSISTENT WITH THE COURT'S OPINION ON OR BEFORE 10/30/2015. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE ACTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NORMA L. SHAPIRO ON 9/29/2015. 9/29/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED. (aeg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL NUTTER; LOUIS GIORLA;
and JOHN DELANEY
AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of plaintiff’s
“Complaint,” defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim,” plaintiff’s “Response to
Defendants Motion to Dismiss," and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum of
today’s date, it is ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim” (paper no. 7) is
2. Plaintiff is given leave to file and serve an amended complaint stating a plausible claim
against defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 consistent with the court’s opinion on or before
October 30, 2015. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the action.
/s/ Norma L. Shapiro
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?