CAITLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. J.J. WHITE, INC.
Filing
134
ORDER THAT MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION, OR ALTERNATIVELY, RECONSIDERATION, FILED BY DEFT/COUNTERPLAINTIFF J.J. WHITE, INC. & COUNTERPLAINTIFFS SUNOCO, INC. & SUNOCO, INC. (R&M) (DOC. NO. 117) IS GRANTED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 6/26/19. 6/27/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
____________________________________________
CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO.,
:
:
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant,
:
v.
:
:
J.J. WHITE, INC.,
:
:
Defendant/Counterplaintiff, :
:
SUNOCO, INC., et al.,
:
:
Counterplaintiffs.
:
____________________________________________:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 14-1255
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2019, upon consideration of the “Motion for
Clarification, or Alternatively, Reconsideration” filed by Defendant/Counterplaintiff J.J. White,
Inc. and Counterplaintiffs Sunoco, Inc. and Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) (Doc. No. 117), the Response
and Reply thereto, following oral argument and supplemental briefing on the Motion, and for the
reasons set forth in this Court’s accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED
that:
•
The “Motion for Clarification, or Alternatively, Reconsideration” filed by
Defendant/Counterplaintiff J.J. White, Inc. and Counterplaintiffs Sunoco, Inc. and
Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) (Doc. No. 117) is GRANTED.
•
The Court’s February 27, 2018, Memorandum Opinion (Doc. No. 114) is hereby
AMENDED as follows: On page 29, the following language is stricken: “—i.e., that
Gans’ leukemia was caused by exposures to BTEX occurring on or after the
retroactive date.”
•
The February 27, 2018, Memorandum Opinion is further AMENDED to incorporate
the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg
____________________________
MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?