ACKAWAY v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Filing
43
ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 34) IS DENIED; 2. THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 35) IS GRANTED; 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, ANNA ACKAWAY; AND 4. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/30/2016. 9/30/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANNA ACKAWAY,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Plaintiff,
v.
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-1300
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, after considering (1) the motion for
summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, Anna Ackaway (Doc. No. 34); (2) the motion for
summary judgment and separately-filed statement of facts filed by the defendant, Aetna Life
Insurance Company (Doc. Nos. 35, 36); (3) the administrative record (Doc. No. 37); (4) the
plaintiff’s response to the defendant’s statement of material facts and reply brief (Doc. No. 38);
(5) the defendant’s response to the plaintiff’s statement of facts (Doc. No. 39); and (6) the
defendant’s response in opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No.
40); and after hearing oral argument from counsel (Doc. No. 41); and for the reasons stated in the
separately-filed memorandum opinion; accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 34) is DENIED;
2.
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 35) is GRANTED;
3.
Judgment is entered in favor of the defendant, Aetna Life Insurance Company,
and against the plaintiff, Anna Ackaway; and
4.
The clerk of court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?