CAMPS v. NUTTER et al

Filing 43

ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANTS SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 26) IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORDER COMPELLING DISCOVERY (DOC. NO. 36) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/27/17. 6/27/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(jpd )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CALVIN CAMPS,
Plaintiff,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-01498

v.
MICHAEL NUTTER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of the Second
Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Giorla, Delaney and the City of Philadelphia,
(ECF No. 26), and Plaintiff Camps’s Response, (ECF No. 34), it is hereby ORDERED
that Defendants’ Motion, (ECF No. 26), is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that
Camps’s Motion for Order Compelling Discovery, (ECF No. 36), is DENIED without
prejudice.1

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

The parties need not conduct discovery until after the Rule 26(f) Conference. See FED. R.
CIV. P. 26(d)(1), (d)(2)(B).
1