WASHINGTON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al

Filing 48

ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CIVIL ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(b), ALTERNATIVELY IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS ON ALL CLAIMS IN PLAINITFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 8/22/16. 8/23/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(jpd,)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER WASHINGTON
v.
SERGEANT ERWIN, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 14-1527

ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2016, it is ORDERED:
•

Upon consideration of the factors set forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty
Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is ORDERED the above-captioned civil action is DISMISSED with
prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

•

Alternatively, it is ORDERED Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
(Document 36) is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on all
claims in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint.

•

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.

.