SOTO v. POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE NOS. 1-4 et al

Filing 26

ORDER THAT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/8/2015. 10/9/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ERIC SOTO : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al. Defendants. CIVIL ACTION No. 14-2173 ORDER This 8th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant the City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the parties briefing of these motions, it is ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum: 1. Defendant the City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is GRANTED; and 2. Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. All of Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?