SOTO v. POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE NOS. 1-4 et al
ORDER THAT CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT IS GRANTED. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. ALL OF PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 10/8/2015. 10/9/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al.
This 8th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant the City of Philadelphia’s
Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint, Defendant City of
Philadelphia’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and the parties briefing of these motions, it is
ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum:
1. Defendant the City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to
Plaintiff’s Complaint is GRANTED; and
2. Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
All of Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. The
Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?