CHARTOCK et al v. AMTRAK et al
Filing
32
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 10/2015. 10/21/15 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MITCHELL CHARTOCK and
TIKICO, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
AMTRAK, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-2327
ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of the Motion for
Reconsideration by Plaintiffs Mitchell Chartock and Tikico, LLC (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)
(Docket No. 29), and the Response in Opposition by Defendant National Railroad Passenger
Corporation (“Defendant”) (Docket No. 30), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is
DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
_s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter ________
RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
