NOEL et al v. ONE WEST BANK
Filing
4
ORDERED THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT'S ORDER OF 3/12/2014 DISMISSING THE NOEL'S ADVERSARY CASE WITH PREJUDICE IS AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THIS COURT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION TO CONSIDER THE PROPRIETY OF THE SANCTIONS AWARD FOUND IN THE BANKRUPTY COURT'S ORDER, AND FOR THIS REASON, THE APPEAL OF THE SANCTIONS AWARD IS DENIED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/12/15. 9/2/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED AND MAILED TO PRO SE PARTIES.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NECHOLAS NOEL and CARTION NOEL,
Appellants,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-2899
J\
v.
I '/-{YI>'!£~
ONEWEST BANK F/D/B/A INDYMAC
BANK,
Appellee.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2015, upon consideration of Appellants' Brief (Doc.
No. 5), Appellee's Response (Doc. No. 6), and Appellants' Reply (Doc. No. 7), and in
accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED that the Bankruptcy
Court's Order of March 12, 2014 dismissing the Noels' Adversary Case with Prejudice is
AFFIRMED.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that this Court does not have jurisdiction to
consider the propriety of the sanctions award found in the Bankruptcy Court's Order, and for this
reason, the appeal of the sanctions award is DENIED. The Clerk of Court shall close this case
for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?