TUNSIL v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al

Filing 95

ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS (DOC. NOS. 71 & 72) ARE GRANATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PLFF'S COMPLAINT, IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 11/30/15. 11/30/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BARRETT S. TUNSIL,

CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff,

v.

FOL ":D

No. 14-cv-2383

Nov 3 o2015

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.,
Defendants.

MICHAEi [

By

I ',

- ·· 1 ''"'

~.

C!ar:-

-------Deo. Cb:r

ORDER
ft

AND NOW, this3b day ofNovember, 2015 , upon consideration of the
Defendants ' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 71 & 72), all responses thereto, and after a
hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the motions are GRANTED, in accord with the
accompanying memorandum.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case as CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

~~STENGEL,

J.