BOWENS v. EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al

Filing 82

ORDER THAT BRATTON AND MARTINEZ'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DR. P. BRATTON AND DR. MARTINEZ AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF MONTEZ M. BOWENS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/23/16. 6/23/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MONTEZ M. BOWENS v. EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2689 ORDER AND NOW this 23rd day of June, 2016, upon consideration of a motion for summary judgment by defendants Dr. P. Bratton and Dr. Martinez, Dkt. No. 68, a memorandum in support thereof, Dkt. No. 70, their statement of facts, Dkt. No. 70, a lengthy appendix to their motion. Dkt. Nos. 71-74, and an opposition to Bratton and Martinez’s motion by plaintiff Montez M. Bowens, Dkt. No. 78, and consistent with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that Bratton and Martinez’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Dr. P. Bratton and Dr. Martinez and against plaintiff Montez M. Bowens. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?