COTTINGHAM v. TUTOR PERINI BUILDING CORP.
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS TUTOR PERINI BUILDING CORPORATION AND KEATING BUILDING CORPORATION AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF CORY COTTINGHAM ON ALL CLAIMS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/21/2017. 2/21/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
TUTOR PERINI BUILDING CORP. et al.
AND NOW this 21st day of February, 2017, upon consideration of the motion for
summary judgment by defendants Tutor Perini Building Corporation and Keating Building
Corporation, 1 and accompanying briefs, Dkt. Nos. 66 (Mot. and Mem.), 69 (Reply) and 71 (SurReply), and the responses of plaintiff Cory Cottingham, Dkt. Nos. 68 (Response) and 70 (Reply),
it is ORDERED that defendants’ motion is GRANTED. JUDGMENT is ENTERED in favor of
defendants, Tutor Perini Building Corporation and Keating Building Corporation, and against
plaintiff Cory Cottingham on all claims.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Plaintiff sues defendant Keating Building Company, LLC under the name Keating
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?