INNELLA v. LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION et al

Filing 74

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF'S CLIAM FOR INTERFERENCE UNDER 29 U.S.C. 2615(a)(1) IS DENIED; AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR RETALIATION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2615(a)(2) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/23/15. 12/24/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RAFAELLA INNELLA
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 14-2862
LENAPE VALLEY FOUNDATION, et al.

ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND NOW, this 23rd day of December, 2015, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
memorandum, upon consideration of Defendant Lenape Valley Foundation’s Motion for
Summary Judgment (Dkt. 55) and all responses, replies, memoranda, and submissions thereto, it
is hereby ORDERED that:
1.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment with regard to Plaintiff’s claim for

interference under 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(1) is DENIED; and
2.

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment with regard to Plaintiff’s claim for

retaliation under 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2) is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Michael M. Baylson
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.

O:\Lana.2015\Innella v. LVF 14-2862\Order MSJ.doc