SMITH v. FISHER et al
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; THE COURT DECLINES TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-2935.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/15/16. 8/16/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JON D. FISHER, et al.
AND NOW, this 15th day of August, 2016, upon careful and independent consideration of
the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Docket No. 1), and all
documents filed in connection therewith, and after review of United States Magistrate Judge
Lynne A. Sitarski’s Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 18), and consideration of
Petitioner’s Objections thereto (Docket No. 24), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sitarski is APPROVED and
The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
As Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right or demonstrated that a reasonable jurist would debate the
correctness of this ruling, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability
under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE Civil Action No. 14-2935.
BY THE COURT:
/s/John R. Padova
John R. Padova, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?