PATEL v. PATEL
Filing
74
ORDER THAT THE RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND MOTION IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL (DOC. 56 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 5/25/2016. 5/25/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
________________________________________
ALKESH PATEL,
Plaintiff
Counter-Defendant,
v.
PRATIK PATEL,
Defendant
Counter-Plaintiff.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 14-2949
ORDER
AND NOW, this
25th
day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the Renewed
Motion For Judgment as A Matter of Law and Motion in the Alternative for a New Trial (Doc.
No. 56) filed by Counterclaim Defendant, Alkesh Patel (“Defendant”), the Response in
Opposition filed by Counterclaim Plaintiff, Pratik Patel (“Plaintiff”), Defendant’s Reply to
Plaintiff’s Opposition, and Plaintiff’s Surreply, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is
DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Robert F. Kelly
ROBERT F. KELLY
SENIOR JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?