PATEL v. PATEL

Filing 74

ORDER THAT THE RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND MOTION IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A NEW TRIAL (DOC. 56 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE ROBERT F. KELLY ON 5/25/2016. 5/25/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ________________________________________ ALKESH PATEL, Plaintiff Counter-Defendant, v. PRATIK PATEL, Defendant Counter-Plaintiff. : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 14-2949 ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2016, upon consideration of the Renewed Motion For Judgment as A Matter of Law and Motion in the Alternative for a New Trial (Doc. No. 56) filed by Counterclaim Defendant, Alkesh Patel (“Defendant”), the Response in Opposition filed by Counterclaim Plaintiff, Pratik Patel (“Plaintiff”), Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition, and Plaintiff’s Surreply, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Robert F. Kelly ROBERT F. KELLY SENIOR JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?