JONES v. DAVIDSON et al

Filing 76

OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C.O. KENNETH DAVIDSON AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF JAMES JONES. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THA T THE MOTION FOR EXTENSION IS DISMISSED AS MOOT, AND THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 8/8/16. 8/10/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMES JONES, Plaintiff v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER, “C.O.” KENNETH DAVIDSON, Defendant ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 14-cv-03099 O R D E R NOW, this 8th day of August, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, which motion was filed June 14, 2016 (Document 62), together with Exhibits A through E (Documents 62-2 through 62-6); Plaintiff, Response in Oppossition [sic] to Defendant Motion for Summary Judgement, which response was filed June 24, 2016 (Document 64); and Motion to Modify Case Management Order Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 16(b)(4), which motion was filed by defendant on August 8, 2016 (“Motion for Extension”) (Document 71); and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendant Correctional Officer, “C.O.” Kenneth Davidson, and against plaintiff James Jones. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension is dismissed as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ James Knoll Gardner_____ James Knoll Gardner United States District Judge -ii-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?