MANLEY v. PREMIUM SPRAY PRODUCTS, INC. et al

Filing 19

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION ARE GRANTED. DEFENDANTS' ALTERNATE MOTIONS TO TRANSFER VENUE ARE DNEIED. PSP'S MOTION TO STRIKE THE AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE, TO SEAL THE COMPLAINT AND TO STRIKE CERTAIN PARAGRAPHS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 3/31/15. 4/1/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONALD A. MANLEY
v.
PREMIUM SPRAY PRODUCTS, INC.,
ET AL.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-3379

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2015, upon consideration of PSP’s Motion to
Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue (ECF No. 8); COIM’s
Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction, and, in the Alternative, for Change of
Venue to the District of New Jersey (ECF No. 13); and PSP’s Motion to Strike the Affidavit of
Service, Seal the Complaint, and Strike Certain Paragraphs (ECF No. 7); and all documents
submitted in support thereof, and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1.

Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction (ECF
Nos. 8, 13) are GRANTED.

2.

Defendants’ Alternative Motions to Transfer Venue (ECF Nos. 8, 13) are
DENIED.

3.

PSP’s Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Service, to Seal the Complaint, and to
Strike Certain Paragraphs (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in
part. The Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Service is GRANTED. The Motions
to Seal the Complaint and to Strike Certain Paragraphs are DENIED.

4.

Plaintiff’s request for jurisdictional discovery is DENIED.

5.

Plaintiff’s request for reimbursement of service costs is DENIED.

6.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.