LIEBERMAN v. CORPORACION EXPERIENCA UNICA, S.A. et al

Filing 238

ORDERED AS FOLLOWS THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY (ECF NO. 235) IS GRANTED. 2. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELIEF (ECF NO. 231) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PURSUANT TO THAT MOTION, DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON PLAINTIFFS BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM RELATED TO ACCESS TO AND USE OF THE UNIT IS GRANTED. THE AWARD OF COMPENSATORY DAMAGES SET FORTH IN THE JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,468,699 WILL THEREFORE BE REDUCED BY $695,000. ALL O THER RELIEF REQUESTED IN DEFENDANTS MOTION (ECF NO. 231) IS DENIED. 3. PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS TO AMEND/CORRECT THE JUDGMENT AND FOR COSTS AND INTEREST (ECF NOS. 228, 229) ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: A. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO ADD PRE JUDGMENT INTEREST TO THE JUDGMENT IS DENIED; B. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO ADD POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST IS GRANTED; AND C. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST TO ADD STATUTORY COSTS IS GRANTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,376.08. 4. AN AMENDED JUDGMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $1, 777,075.08, CONSISTING OF $1,773,699.00 IN COMPENSATORY DAMAGES AND $3,376.08 IN COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920, PLUS POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1961, WILL FOLLOW. 5. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/26/22. 7/27/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE ESTATE OF DR. RICHARD LIEBERMAN, v. Plaintiff, PLAYA DULCE VIA, S.A., Defendant. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3393 ORDER AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2022, upon consideration of the parties’ post-trial motions (ECF Nos. 228, 229, 231, 235), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply (ECF No. 235) is GRANTED. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Post-Trial Relief (ECF No. 231) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Pursuant to that motion, Defendant’s request for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim related to access to and use of the unit is GRANTED. The award of compensatory damages set forth in the judgment in the amount of $2,468,699 will therefore be reduced by $695,000. All other relief requested in Defendant’s motion (ECF No. 231) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff’s motions to Amend/Correct the Judgment and for Costs and Interest (ECF Nos. 228, 229) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. Plaintiff’s request to add prejudgment interest to the judgment is DENIED; b. Plaintiff’s request to add post-judgment interest is GRANTED; and c. Plaintiff’s request to add statutory costs is GRANTED in the amount of $3,376.08. 4. An amended judgment in the amount of $1,777,075.08, consisting of $1,773,699.00 in compensatory damages and $3,376.08 in costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, plus post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, will follow. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________ EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?