LEISK et al v. ELLIOTT et al

Filing 16

ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE RONALD L. BUCKWALTER ON 11/12/2014. 11/14/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT LEISK and ROSE LEISK (h/w), Plaintiffs, v. LESLIE PINCUS ELLIOT, LESTER E. LIPSCHUTZ and MARK S. HALPERN, CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF GERALDINE PINCUS, Deceased, and NATHAN PINCUS, Individually. Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-3639 ORDER AND NOW, this 12th day of November, 2014, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Nathan Pincus, Leslie Pincus Leslie, Lester E. Lipschutz, and Mark S. Halpern (Docket No. 9) and the Response of Plaintiffs Robert Leisk and Rose Leisk (Docket No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED in its entirety. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?