PHINISEE v. LAYSER et al

Filing 56

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 12/16/14. 12/17/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RASHEENA PHINISEE, individually and on behalf of A.P., a minor, as her parent and natural guardian, Plaintiffs, v. DEREK LAYSER, ESQ., et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 14-3896 ORDER AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of the Rule 11 Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s Counsel and In Favor of Defendants, Gilbert G. Spencer, Jr. and Spencer & Associates (Document No. 34); Defendants Derek R. Layser, Esq. and Layser & Freiwald, P.C.’s Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 (Document No. 39); the Motion for Sanctions Against Plaintiffs’ Counsel and In Favor of Defendants, Gilbert G. Spencer, Jr. and Spencer & Associates (Document No. 41); and Plaintiffs’ responses thereto, and for the reasons provided in this Court’s Memorandum dated December 16th, 2014, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ motions are DENIED. BY THE COURT: Berle M. Schiller, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?