PETROSKY v. ALLSTATE FIRE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 22

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 IS DENIED, AND PLAINTIFF ALAN PETROSKY'S CROSS-REQUEST FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 16 AT 13) IS GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS RESPECTFULLY DIRECTED TO REMOVE THIS ACTION FROM THE COURT'S ACTIVE DOCKET AND MARK IT CLOSED AND TERMINATED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 10/30/15. 10/30/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALAN PETROSKY v. ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 14-3970 ORDER AND NOW this 30th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of the parties= moving papers, 1 it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company=s (AAllstate@) Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED, and Plaintiff Alan Petrosky=s cross-request for summary judgment (Doc. No. 16 at 13) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that under the terms of the automobile insurance policy issued by Allstate to Petrosky (Doc. No. 15-6), Petrosky is entitled to payment by Allstate of underinsured motorist insurance benefits (UIM), see accompanying Memorandum. The Court retains jurisdiction for ninety (90) days from today’s date. During that period, should the parties be unable to resolve the insured damages, either side may move the Court for further adjudication or assistance in resolving this action. The CLERK OF COURT is respectfully DIRECTED to remove this action from the Court’s active docket and mark it CLOSED and TERMINATED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Legrome D. Davis Legrome D. Davis, J. 1 Defendant Allstate=s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 15), Plaintiff Alan Petrosky=s Response (Doc. No. 16), Defendant=s Reply (Doc. No. 17), and Plaintiff=s and Defendant=s respective Supplemental Briefs (Doc. Nos. 19, 20).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?