SANTIAGO v. A.R. RESOURCES, INC.
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT A.R. RESOURCES, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [#30] IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT A.R. RESOURCES, INC. AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF JANIXA SANTIAGO. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIF F'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE MORE FULL AND COMPLETE RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY REQUESTS [#35], AND DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER [#38] ARE DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/26/15. 2/27/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JANIXA SANTIAGO
v.
A.R. RESOURCES, INC.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-4240
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2015, upon consideration of defendant A.R.
Resources, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 30, plaintiff Janixa Santiago’s
response and brief in response thereto, Dkt. Nos. 33 and 36, and defendant’s reply. Dkt. No. 37,
it is ORDERED that defendants motion is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor
of defendant A.R. Resources, Inc. and against plaintiff Janixa Santiago.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel defendant to provide more
full and complete responses to plaintiff’s discovery requests, Dkt. No. 35, and defendant’s
motion for a protective order, Dkt. No. 38, are DENIED as moot.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?