PATERNO et al v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

Filing 28

ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNTS I & III ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 2/25/16. 2/26/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH (“JAY”) V. PATERNO, et al., Plaintiffs : : : : : : : : : vs. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-4365 ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2016, upon consideration of the defendant’s motion to dismiss (Document #14), the plaintiffs’ response thereto (Document #21), and the defendant’s reply brief (Document #22), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. Counts I and III are DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. Because I decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, the remaining state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED for all purposes. BY THE COURT: /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?