MASSAQUOI v. HASKINS et al
OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 47) IS GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANTS PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM HEALTH SERVICES AND WARDEN LAWTON ONLY. DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS DENIED AS TO DEFENDANT OFFICER BLACK; AND PLAINT IFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 56) IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 8/29/17. 8/30/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED. (ky, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAPTAIN HASKINS, OFFICER
WADELL, OFFICER BLACK, WARDEN
WILLIAMS LAWTON, and PHILA. PRISON
SYSTEM HEALTH SERVICES,
AND NOW, this 29th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss (Docket No. 47) and Memorandum of Law in support, as well as Plaintiff’s opposition
thereto, and the Second Amended Complaint in this matter, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 47) is GRANTED as to Defendants
Philadelphia Prison System Health Services and Warden Lawton only;
2. Philadelphia Prison System Health Services and Warden William Lawton are
dismissed from this matter with prejudice;
3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Defendant Officer Black; and
4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss (Docket No. 56) is DENIED as moot.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?