FIELDS v. JOHN DOE #1 OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS et al

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [#15] IS GRANTED, AS EXPLAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THE PLAINTIFF'S ANTITRUST CLAIMS AND EMBEZZLEMENT CLAIM ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING CLAI MS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. THE PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE THIS ORDER IS ENTERED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 6/4/15. 6/4/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO FIELDS. (fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VERRON FIELDS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN DOE #1, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-4573 ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) and plaintiff’s response thereto (Doc. No. 19), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, as explained in the accompanying memorandum. The plaintiff’s antitrust claims and embezzlement claim are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint. The plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered.1 BY THE COURT: /s/Lawrence F. Stengel LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J. 1 The plaintiff should cure the deficiencies noted in the accompanying memorandum.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?