FIELDS v. JOHN DOE #1 OF THE BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS [#15] IS GRANTED, AS EXPLAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THE PLAINTIFF'S ANTITRUST CLAIMS AND EMBEZZLEMENT CLAIM ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE PLAINTIFF'S REMAINING CLAI MS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT. THE PLAINTIFF MAY FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE THIS ORDER IS ENTERED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 6/4/15. 6/4/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED. COPY MAILED TO FIELDS. (fdc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
VERRON FIELDS,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOE #1, et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO.
14-4573
ORDER
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of defendant’s motion
to dismiss (Doc. No. 15) and plaintiff’s response thereto (Doc. No. 19), it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, as explained in the accompanying
memorandum. The plaintiff’s antitrust claims and embezzlement claim are DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE. The plaintiff’s remaining claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
The plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint. The plaintiff may
file a second amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date this Order is entered.1
BY THE COURT:
/s/Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
1
The plaintiff should cure the deficiencies noted in the accompanying memorandum.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?