ZOBNOWSKI v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Filing
13
(DUPLICATE ENTRY OF #11) ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE HONORABLE RICHARD A. LLORET'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 7) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; 2. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED; 3. THE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SU BSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND IS THEREFORE NOT ENTITLED TO A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2253(c)(2); AND 4. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/16/2015. 9/17/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER ZOBNOWSKI,
Petitioner,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF
PENNSYLVANIA,
Respondent.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-4614
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2015, after considering the petition for writ of
habeas corpus filed by the pro se petitioner, Christopher Zobnowski (Doc. No. 1), the
respondents’ answer thereto (Doc. No. 5), the state-court record, the petitioner’s supporting
memorandum of law (Doc. No. 6), and the report and recommendation filed by United States
Magistrate Judge Richard A. Lloret (Doc. No. 7); and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1.
The Honorable Richard A. Lloret’s report and recommendation (Doc. No. 7) is
APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED;
3.
The petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right and is therefore not entitled to a certificate of appealability, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); and
4.
The clerk of court shall mark this case as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Edward G. Smith, J.
EDWARD G. SMITH, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?