SOUROVELIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 365

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE RESTITUTIONARY CLAIMS CONSENT DECREE (DOC. NO. 331 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/27/21. 1/27/21 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE; E-MAILED.(amas, )

Download PDF
Case 2:14-cv-04687-ER Document 365 Filed 01/27/21 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTOS SOUROVELIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 14-4687 O R D E R AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2021, upon consideration of “Plaintiffs’ Consent Motion and Memorandum in Support of Final Approval of Class Certification and Consent Decree on Plaintiff’s Fifth and Sixth Claims for Relief” (the “Restitutionary Claims Consent Decree”) (ECF No. 331), and after a hearing on October 14, 2020, additional briefing on the cy pres award, and a further telephonic hearing on December 14, 2020, for the reasons stated in the memorandum filed on this same date, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion to approve the Restitutionary Claims Consent Decree is GRANTED in part and: a. The Court certifies the following settlement class as it meets the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3). For purposes of the Fifth and Sixth Claims for Relief in the Third Amended Complaint, the Restitutionary Class shall consist of: All persons who held or hold legal title to, or otherwise had or have a legal interest in property against which a Statutory or Common Law civil-forfeiture petition (i) was pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County as of August 11, 2012; or Case 2:14-cv-04687-ER Document 365 Filed 01/27/21 Page 2 of 2 (ii) was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on or after August 11, 2012 until the date the Court grants preliminary approval. b. The Court appoints Named Plaintiffs Christos Sourovelis, Doila Welch, Norys Hernandez, and Nassir Geiger as class representatives for the Restitutionary Class. c. Upon consideration of the factors in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(g), the Court appoints the Institute for Justice and David Rudovsky, Esq. of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin as Class Counsel. d. The Court will approve, should it be filed, a version of the Restitutionary Claims Consent Decree as discussed and detailed in the memorandum of this same date, including its permanent injunction provisions, as fair, reasonable, and adequate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(2). e. The parties may file a joint modified Restitutionary Claims Consent Decree which conforms to the Restitutionary Fund distribution adopted by the Court no later than March 1, 2021. f. Should the parties file such a modified Consent Decree, the Court will approve it and will retain jurisdiction to effectuate and interpret the Restitutionary Claims Consent Decree. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?