CLOYD v. DELAWARE COUNTY et al

Filing 23

ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS DEFTS. DELAWARE COUNTY AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS (CEC) (ECF 13) IS GRANTED; MOTION OF DEFTS. DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, HOLLY CRAIG, CRNP AND KELLY MULLAN, PA-C TO DISMISS PLFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF 14) IS GRANTED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/23/15. 3/24/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN. (pr, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM CLOYD CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 14-4833 DELAWARE COUNTY, ET AL. ORDER And NOW, this 23rd day of March 2015, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum, upon consideration of Defendants Delaware County and Community Education Centers Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF 13), and Motion of Defendants Dr. Ronal Phillips, Holly Craig, CRNP and Kelly Mullan, PA-C to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF 14), and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Delaware County and Community Education Centers (“CEC”) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Delaware County and CEC based on a municipal policy or custom of providing inadequate medical care are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s claims against Delaware County and CEC based on failure to train and Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. The Motion to Dismiss of Defendants Dr. Phillips, Ms. Craig, and Ms. Mullan is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims against Dr. Phillips, Ms. Craig, and Ms. Mullan under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are DISMISSED WTHOUT PREJUDICE, with leave to amend. Plaintiff’s claim against Dr. Phillips for negligence in violation of Pennsylvania state law is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with leave to amend. BY THE COURT: s/Michael M. Baylson __________________________ Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 14\14-4833 cloyd v. del cty\Order re MTD.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?