PATEL v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT OBJECTIONS TO REPORT & RECOMMENDATION ARE SUSTAINED; THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION IS REJECTED IN PART & NOT APPROVED AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION; PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REVERSAL IS GRANTED; & THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER REVIEW CONSISTENT WITH THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION & THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION PURSUANT TO THE FOURTH SENTENCE OF 42 U.S.C. SEC. 405(g). SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/13/16. 10/14/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-4955
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
AND NOW, this 13th day of October 2016, after careful review and independent
consideration of Plaintiff’s request for review, Defendant’s response, the Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells, the objections to
the Report and Recommendation and the response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
The Objections to Report and Recommendation are SUSTAINED;
The Report and Recommendation is REJECTED IN PART and NOT
APPROVED as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion;
The Plaintiff’s request for reversal is GRANTED; and
The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further review consistent with
the Report and Recommendation and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion pursuant to the
fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
It is so ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?