ROBINSON v. LANEKO ENGINEERING COMPANY et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 13) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/30/15. 7/1/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF, EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THOMAS E. ROBINSON, JR.
LANEKO ENGINEERING COMPANY
and WILLIAM JAMES DERRAH, SR.
AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13) and all briefs filed in support of or opposition thereto (Doc.
Nos. 22, 23, 25, 27, 30), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint
is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?