ROBINSON v. LANEKO ENGINEERING COMPANY et al

Filing 33

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 13) IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 6/30/15. 7/1/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF, EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS E. ROBINSON, JR. Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-05036 v. LANEKO ENGINEERING COMPANY and WILLIAM JAMES DERRAH, SR. Defendants ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of June, 2015, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 13) and all briefs filed in support of or opposition thereto (Doc. Nos. 22, 23, 25, 27, 30), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?