XTREME CAGED COMBAT et al v. CAGE FURY FIGHTING CHAMPIONSHIPS et al

Filing 96

ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JDUGMENT (DOC. 83 ) IS GRATED IN PART. XTREME CAGED COMBAT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS A PARTY TO THIS ACTION. THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS OTHERWISE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THE CAPTION IS AMENDED AS REFLECTED ABOVE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/20/2015. 8/21/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RYAN KERWIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAGE FURY FIGHTING
CHAMPIONSHIPS, et. al.
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
14-5159

ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of August 2015, upon consideration of defendants’
motion for summary judgment, doc. no. 83, and plaintiff’s response thereto, doc. no. 89,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.

The motion for summary judgment, doc. no. 83, is GRANTED in part.

2.

Xtreme Caged Combat is DISMISSED with prejudice as a party to this

3.

The motion for summary judgment, doc. no. 83, is otherwise DENIED

action.

without prejudice.
4.

The caption is amended as reflected above.
BY THE COURT
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.