WEST v. MCFADDEN et al
Filing
28
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT MCFADDEN'S MOTION IS GRANTED AND JUDGEMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF WARDEN EDWARD G. MCFADDEN AND AGAINST CHRISTOPHER H. WEST; DEFENDANT GESSNER'S MOTION IS GRANTED AND JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DR. VICRTORIA GESSNER AND AGAINST CHRISTOPHER WEST; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISITCAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 4/13/16. 4/13/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER H. WEST
v.
WARDEN MCFADDEN, et al.
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-5210
ORDER
AND NOW this 13th day of April, 2016, upon consideration of defendant Dr. Victoria
Gessner’s motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 22, the motion of defendant Warden D.
Edward McFadden for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c), Dkt. No. 24, and
plaintiff Christopher H. West’s response to defendants’ motions, Dkt. No. 25, and consistent
with the accompanying memorandum of law, it is ORDERED that:
1.
Defendant McFadden’s motion is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in
favor of Warden D. Edward McFadden and AGAINST Christopher H. West.
2.
Defendant Gessner’s motion is GRANTED and JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in
favor of Dr. Victoria Gessner and AGAINST Christopher H. West.
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.
THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?