LARUSSO v. COLVIN

Filing 15

ORDER THAT THE REPORT & RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED & ADOPTED; DEFT'S UNCONTESTED MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED, & THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ETC. PLFF'S BRIEF AND STATEMENT OF ISSUES IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST F OR REVIEW & MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFT'S MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE HER RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR REVIEW OF PLFF ARE DEEMED MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 2/23/15. 2/23/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GERALD LARUSSO, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 14-5225 ORDER AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review and Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 8), Defendant’s Uncontested Motion to Remand (Docket No. 11) and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin (Docket No. 12), the Court hereby ORDERS and DECREES that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. Defendant’s Uncontested Motion to Remand (Docket No. 11) is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 12); and 3. Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review and Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 8) and Defendant’s Motion for an Enlargement of Time to File Her Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff (Docket No. 9) are DEEMED MOOT. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?