ACCOR v. GIROUX et al
Filing
12
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT FOR HABEAS CORPUS FILED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 3/8/16. 3/9/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED. (mas, )
Case 2:14-cv-05255-ER Document 10-1 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1of1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION
STEVEN ACCOR,
Petitioner,
fF
nR
[: ,,
\,}
\:
~
v.
NANCY GIROUX, et al.,
Respondents.
AND NOW, this
~
~
~ dayof
ll .,
Mt.~
NO. 14-5255
=1-u
I
'
._..;:a ' ... ~-
·=
!·I.
'j
\
;.
S 2016
1
Mir·., •.. -: ·." ., ·-·. r.'ork
I
• -~~-~--~~~~"~
. ,
.• Jrk
ORDER
I (,
, 20_ _, upon
careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is
DISMISSED with prejudice.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?