CANNON v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ORDERED THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 5) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS SET FORTH IN THE ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 12/29/14. 12/30/14 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CITY AND COUNTY OF
PHILADELPHIA et al.,
AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2014, upon consideration of Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 5), Mr. Cannon’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 6), and
after oral argument on December 5, 2014, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Motion to
Dismiss (Docket No. 5) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART so that:
The Motion is GRANTED as to Counts 1, 3, and 5 of the Complaint, purporting
to state claims against the City and County of Philadelphia and Police Commissioner Charles H.
Ramsey. All claims against Defendants the City and County of Philadelphia and Police
Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey, including Counts 1, 3, and 5 of the Complaint, are
The Motion is DENIED as to Count 13 of the Complaint.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?