SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED v. MONARCH MED SPA, INC. et al

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 21 IS GRANTED. THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT CONCERNING THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EXCLUSIONS IN THE INSURANCE POLICY PURCHASED BY DEFENDANTS. ACCORDINGLY, THIS COURT ENTERS SUMMARY JUDGMENT THAT THE PLAINTIFF OWES NO CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION OR DUTY TO INDEMNIFY OR DEFEND UNDER THE INSURANCE POLICIES AT ISSUE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 4/30/15. 5/1/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED CIVIL ACTION vs. NO. 14-5450 MONARCH MED SPA, INC. et al ORDER AND NOW, this 30th day of April 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 21), with supporting memoranda and statement of undisputed facts, Defendants' Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 23) and Plaintiffs Reply (ECF Doc. No. 24), It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 21) is GRANTED. There is no genuine issue of material fact concerning the interpretation of the exclusions in the insurance policy purchased by Defendants. Accordingly, this Court enters summary judgment that the Plaintiff owes no contractual obligation or duty to indemnify or defend under the insurance policies at issue. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this matter. KE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?