CLARK v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [#6] IS DISMISSED AS MOOT AS PLAINTIFF FILED AN AMENDED COMPLAINT. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT [#8] IS GRANTED AS FOLLOW S: COUNT I IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNT II IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ASSERTION OF THE CLAIM IN THE APPROPRIATE STATE COURT. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 4/21/15. 4/22/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ ROBIN CLARK : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-5460 : : PHILADELPHIA HOUSING : AUTHORITY : Defendant. : ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of April 2015, upon consideration of the pending motions and the responses thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. No. 6] is DISMISSED AS MOOT as Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 8] is GRANTED as follows: Count I is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Count II is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to assertion of the claim in the appropriate state court. 3. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the case. It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT: /s/Cynthia M. Rufe ____________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?