TRAN v. SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.

Filing 13

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: THE PART OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION THAT SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S BREACH OF CONTRACT CLAIM IS DENIED. THE PART OF DEF ENDANT'S MOTION THAT SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S BAD-FAITH CLAIM IS GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED THAT A CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE FOR THE PURPOSES OF SCHEDULING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS WILL BE CONDUCTED IN DUE COURSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 10/14/15. 10/14/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DEP T. TRAN, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant. NO. 14-5491 ORDER AND NOW, this 14th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of defendant Seneca Insurance Company, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits (Document No. 9, filed May 29, 2015), and plaintiff Dep T. Tran’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and attached exhibits (Document No. 10, filed June 22, 2015), for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum dated October 14, 2015, IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as follows: 1. That part of defendant’s Motion that seeks summary judgment on plaintiff’s breach of contract claim is DENIED; 2. That part of defendant’s Motion that seeks summary judgment on plaintiff’s bad-faith claim is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a conference by telephone for the purpose of scheduling further proceedings will be conducted in due course. BY THE COURT: /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?