BRADSHAW v. WENEROWICZ et al
ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION IS GRANTED. PLFF'S COMPLAINT (DOC. 6) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED PLFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (DOC. 44) IS DENIED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 3/28/17. 3/29/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2017, Defendant Sue Karpinski having made an oral
motion to dismiss the above-captioned action for failure to appear and prosecute pursuant to
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f)(1), 37(b)(2)(A)(v), and 41(b), and upon consideration of
the factors set forth in Poulis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984),
and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant’s
Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff Jeffrey Bradshaw’s Complaint (Document 6) is DISMISSED
with prejudice. It is further ORDERED Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw (Document 44) is
DENIED as moot.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?