KNOPICK v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al

Filing 63

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF DOC. 39 ) IS GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNTS I-VII ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT REASSERTING THE CLAIMS IN COUNTS I-VII AS FEDERAL SECURITIES LAW CLASS ACTION ON OR BEFORE 9/8/2015. COUNTS VIII-IX ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/18/2015. 8/18/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NICHOLAS KNOPICK, individually and
on behalf of those similarly situated,

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 14-05639

Plaintiff,
v.
UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant UBS
Financial Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 39), Plaintiff Nicholas Knopick’s
Response in Opposition (ECF No. 48), Defendant’s reply (ECF No. 53), Plaintiff’s sur reply
(ECF No. 61), and counsels’ arguments at a hearing held on July 15, 2015, it is ORDERED that
Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that:
1.

Counts I-VII are dismissed without prejudice;

2.

Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint reasserting the claims in Counts I-VII
as a federal securities law class action on or before September 8, 2015;

3.

Counts VIII-IX are dismissed with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.