SCHULTZ v. EMR, SPC et al

Filing 22

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART, AND PLAINTIFF'S WRONGFUL TERMINATION CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED IN PART AND PLAINTIFF'S STATE LAW DEFAMATION CLA IM IS REMANDED TO THE PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 6/22/2015. 6/23/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER MAILED TO PHILADELPHIA CCP 6/23/2015.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROLAND J. SCHULTZ
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 14-5683
EMR, SPC et al.

ORDER
And NOW, this 22nd day of June 2015, for the reasons stated in the foregoing
memorandum, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended
Complaint (ECF 6) and Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Remand Case to Philadelphia County Court
of Common Pleas (ECF 18), and all responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART, and Plaintiff’s wrongful
termination claims (Counts II and III) are dismissed with prejudice.
2. Plaintiff’s Second Motion to Remand is GRANTED IN PART, and Plaintiff’s state law
defamation claim (Count I) is remanded to the Philadelphia County Court of Common
Pleas.
3. The Clerk shall close this case.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
__________________________
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

O:\CIVIL 14\14-5683 schultz v. emr\14cv5683.Order.MTD.6.22.15.docx